Comment Stream

2 years ago
0
2 years ago
0

Do you think animals are should have right?
Yes because in the news, books, e.c.t debated the question of whether animals have rights of taking the position that, while humans should treat animals with care and respect, animals are not entitled to the same natural, moral rights as people. He asserts that humans should strive to do as much good as possible in their role as the stewards of the earth, which includes using animals for human good.
In a quote of the debate, "Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction. Close contact with animals shows that they look forward to some extents, and can clearly get a lot of enjoyment from their lives". Also in my religion, Buddhism; I am against people taking an animals life. A named would be,vegetarianism of a strongly linked with a number of religions that originated in ancient India such as Jainism, Hinduism and Buddhism.
Animal has a life, the same as we do Such groups, in addition to well-known organizations like the Humane Society and World Wildlife Fund, advocate a sort of traditional welfare theory for animal protection. These organizations represent what has come to be known as the animal welfarist position. Welfarists seek to prevent the unnecessary suffering of animals, but at base believe that humans can and should continue to exploit other animals , knowing in this present of pandas becoming exctinct . Involving humas to think of themselves as the most important and valuable species on earth and having to modify the animials enviorment and they don't give reasons for this belief, but if pressed might say humans are more intelligent than other animals.
Facts
Against animal experiments: Experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because:
⦁ it causes suffering to animals
⦁ the benefits to human beings are not proven
⦁ any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways
Results
These People Are Out Of Their Minds!!!!
⦁ Why are people using animals for experiments? These people (scientist) have no heart for animals.Instead of using poor helpless animals , go use food or people that want to be tested . Animals are creations of god that DON'T deserve to die because of people doing random tests on them!These animals don't deserve to have machines or "medication" put into them!They are fine just how they ar ! I understand that there need to be more medication and treatments done for people with disorders or disease . But in this year "2014" there is a lot of new technology and different other ways to test things!
⦁ No. The tests are unreliable, and there are more options available besides vivisection.
It is unreliable. THE ANATOMY OF AN ANIMAL ID DIFFERENT FROM OURS.. For example, rats, the most used animal for experiments with cancer, do not even get the same type of cancer as us. According to the Food and Drug Administration, 92 out of 100 drugs that passed animal tests failed in humans. Look at how many things were invented or discovered without animal testing: a cure for scurvy, vaccines, and penicillin were all made with out animal testing. THERE ARE ALTERNATIVES.. Scientists are already using human skin tissues, which are much more accurate. Blood samples, DNA testing. If we want to better ourselves as a species, we cannot use another species to suffer for our own betterment. We cannot look upon animals as our test subjects; we have absolutely no right to use them, to make them suffer in pain. The answer is no.
⦁ Dogs used experiments
Animals, cats, monkeys are not at all same genetic make up like humans. Using animals that cannot talk about their symptoms is cruel and inhuman. Let's use Scientists and Doctors for experiments because they can talk and tell us their symptoms and they are just like us. Since they like to use experiments let them be the ones to experiment on.

http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-animals-be-used-for-experiments

Open in New Window
2 years ago
0

You have the idea, except you placed your essay in the comment section rather then the body of the tackk.