The word "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, evaluating the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and trial the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals.The first major reference to animal testing occurred in the late nineteenth century when Louis Pasteur administered anthrax to sheep and showed the importance of vaccines with his germ theory. Since then it has been a major concern to those who minister to animals. Unfortunately, what most people don't understand is that just because they're being used for medical research, doesn't fully estimate that they're in harm's way. To add to that,people don't see the full scenario that animals have always been useful when it comes to supplying our meats and dairy products (It does not concent to all experimentation beast) So why has it come to an argument that animal experimentation should not be allowed?
There is no doubt that the people running against animal experimentation believe that animals are being mistreated in the lab. Although I have facts to prove that reasoning invalid. To start off, a basic term "It Is Not Possible to Completely Replace Animals in Medical Research." In my research, I have found that labs have a signed contract to properly care and neuter for the animals. Thus, it makes total sense that no scientist has the intention to injure their patient when indeed they're much useful for medical reasoning (animal experimentation).
This particular argument applies to just about anyone whose anybody. We all use branded suppliants, but do you ever bother to check where it comes from? I'm sure you got the point, and if you haven't my argument is state that most of your fragrances, clothes, food ,etc.., come the features of the animals (any animal). So my theory is why is it OK to wear animals but not OK to use them for still your benefits? Such as medical reasoning. Exactly, same difference, you may not realize it but we absolutely need animals. We use them practically everyday in our lives.
The simple solution to the problem of animal experimentation is just for society to lay back and let scientist do their job. They're not perusing their experimentations to hurt the animals, they're simply processing any information of diseases or medical help we can seek before it hits humanity. For those who just cannot stand the thought of allowing animals to be used for beneficial reasons, have YOU ever suggested volunteering yourself for experimentation?