A World Without Nuclear Weapons

Source:
Miller, Debra. "Eliminating Nuclear Weapons Will Not Make the World Safer." Nuclear Armament, 2011: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010765210>.

Quote:

Mr. Obama chaired the meeting and pressed the vision of a nuclear-weapons-free world that he had introduced in April. In the practical world of counter proliferation, the president is making little progress in dissuading Iran from building nuclear weapons, has rewarded serial proliferator North Korea with bilateral negotiations and is silent on Venezuela's announced intention to start a nuclear program

Paraphrase:

Even if Mr. Obama makes the United States free from nuclear weapons doesn't mean that the other place would also make them self-nuclear free.

My Ideas:

I will use this Quote to show that even without nuclear weapons it won't change anything.

History:
Created: 04/26/15 09:09 PM

Nuclear Arms and Strategic Interests

Source:
Miller, Debra. "Eliminating Nuclear Weapons Will Not Make the World Safer." Nuclear Armament, 2011: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010765210>.

Quote:

The United States is showing itself unwilling to take the hard steps necessary to stop nuclear proliferation. Countries that are willing to defy the international community know they can have the bomb if they make the investment and are patient.

Paraphrase:

Even if United States approves to become nuclear free the other countries will not go along with us. if we get rid of the we will become venerable for attack.

History:
Created: 04/26/15 09:29 PM

The Dangers of Nuclear Weapons Are Greater than Ever Due to Proliferation and Terrorism

Source:
Miller, Debra. "The Dangers of Nuclear Weapons Are Greater than Ever Due to Proliferation and Terrorism." Nuclear Armament, 2011: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010765207>.

URL:
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010765207

Quote:

In September [2009], U.S. President Barack Obama presided over an extraordinary meeting of heads of state in the United Nations Security Council as it adopted Resolution 1887, resolving to "create the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons."

Paraphrase:

They should keep the nuclear weapon because even if u keep them or get rid of them there will still be terrorism in the world. If they do get rid it will make United States more defenseless to get attacked.

My Ideas:

I am going to use this q/p'3c2uote to show that you shouldn't get rid of our nuclear weapons.

History:
Created: 04/22/15 12:31 PM

The Real Risks

Source:
Miller, Debra. "The Dangers of Nuclear Weapons Are Greater than Ever Due to Proliferation and Terrorism." Nuclear Armament, 2011: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010765207>.

URL:
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010765207

Quote:

Today the dangers of nuclear weapons are greater than ever, the result of proliferation and global terrorist threats. Nine countries have nuclear weapons. If North Korea and Iran acquire full nuclear weapons capability, the world may reach a proliferation tipping point, with the bomb spreading rapidly to other states.

Paraphrase:

The bad side of having nuclear weapons is that more and more countries are going to have them. if North Korea and Iran have full nuclear weapons the world would burn down because all the weapons can destroy states maybe even countries.

My Ideas:

I am going to use this quote to show the negative side to nuclear weapons.

History:
Created: 04/23/15 12:24 PM