#MTrevizoworkscitedpage6thperiod

Unpiled

Allowing States to Define Marriage

Source:

Gacek, Christopher M. "The Defense of Marriage Act Is an Essential Federal Law." Homosexuality, 2013: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010143405>.

Quote:


DOMA affirms the power of each state to make its own decision as to whether it will accept or reject same-sex marriages created in other jurisdictions. This is accomplished by DOMA's second section, which amends the full faith and credit statute by adding this provision:


No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.

My Ideas:


This basically shows that the DOMA can choose wether it accepts the marriage to be divorced and I honestly do not think this is fair because what iuf a couple doesnt want to be to together but the state doesnt let them get divorced just by their gender.

History:

Created: 04/22/15 02:03 PM

Outdated System Promotes Lying

Source:

Toosi, Nahal. "Requiring Fault for Divorce Is Harmful." Divorce, 2009: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010571219>.

Quote:


The plaintiff, (the wife, let's say) can claim, "He told me he didn't love me anymore, that he wanted his freedom, that he had made a mistake from the beginning." The husband neither admits nor denies the charge.


The moving option often comes into play when the desire to divorce is not mutual. But it doesn't always work.

My Ideas:


It shows that the people can actually lie and there are some people that have actually done that or have not actually admitted something that was or was not true.

History:

Created: 04/22/15 02:12 PM

Preserving States' Rights and Marriage

Source:

Gacek, Christopher M. "The Defense of Marriage Act Is an Essential Federal Law." Homosexuality, 2013: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010143405>.

Quote:


The Defense of Marriage Act preserves the right of the states to govern themselves with respect to family law and domestic relations. DOMA impedes judicial activism regarding marriage and provides needed uniformity in federal law.

My Ideas:


This shows that the federal law has the right to accept the choices of people getting divorced and it is on full support.

History:

Created: 04/22/15 01:51 PM

Wasting the Court's Time

Source:

Toosi, Nahal. "Requiring Fault for Divorce Is Harmful." Divorce, 2009: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2015. <http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow?failOverType=&query=&prodId=OVIC&windowstate=normal&contentModules=&display-query=&mode=view&displayGroupName=Viewpoints&limiter=&u=j071909010&currPage=&disableHighlighting=true&displayGroups=&sortBy=&source=&search_within_results=&p=OVIC&action=e&catId=&activityType=&scanId=&documentId=GALE%7CEJ3010571219>.

Quote:


It would seem like an open-and-shut divorce case, with no shortage of reasons to justify ending the marriage once and for all.


Under New York divorce law, couples can split up without either spouse being assigned blame, but only if they first sign a division-of-property agreement and live apart for a year.

My Ideas:


This is the side where couples that want to get a divorce can get split up if they would like and they wouldnot have to justify who was wrong in the relationshi but in New York they would have to sign a contract saying that they should be separated from each other for a year.

History:

Created: 04/22/15 02:13 PM


Comment Stream